Windows 10 is supposed to be Microsoft’s future…
I’ve been using Windows 10 on my Surface Pro for a while now. While I haven’t had many of the Explorer.exe crashes that others have been having, I have been banging on it hard enough to develop an opinion or two.
To be honest, so far… I’m not that impressed. I know that Microsoft REALLY needs to hit a homerun here. They’re pretty much betting the [relevance] farm on it. If it tanks, it’s going to be a really bad 2015 in Redmond. But that’s just me… There’s a lot going on with Windows 10, and (un?)fortunately, we haven’t seen everything.
At least not yet…
To be honest, even though I have been covering the Microsoft ecosystem since 1997, and I’ve written a lot for media organizations like AOL/CompuServe, InformationWeek, Computer Power User Magazine, WUGNET – The Windows User’s Group Network and LockerGnome, among other online and international print publications, I still haven’t broken into that “insider,” inner circle like Mary Jo Foley and Paul Thurrott, even though Paul and I worked together at WUGNET in the late 1990’s.
So when it comes to the inside track, I trust Paul and Mary Jo explicitly. Period.
So again, while I wasn’t impressed with the current state of Windows 10, what I’m hearing from both Paul and Mary Jo is to sit tight. According to Paul, Windows 10 is coming into focus. His recent statements reminded me of what most everyone in the Windows Insider Program heard from the very beginning – what you see now, isn’t the final state of the software.
This is a good thing, because as I said, Windows 10 currently has “work in progress” stamped ALL over it. The last formally released build – Build 9879 – was pretty much a train wreck. For many Insiders, the OS crashed all the time, requiring them to reboot multiple times a day. When Microsoft did release a fix, it wouldn’t install for many; and in many cases, users wouldn’t know if the patch install had failed until they looked at the Windows’ Update History to see which updates had successfully installed or had failed. The fact that the patch was continually presented over and over again as an available update *did* tip most of us off; but to be honest, it could also have been Microsoft issuing additional, related updates.
So, what is Microsoft wanting Windows 10 to be? That’s simple – the future of their desktop and mobile platform. Notice… I didn’t say, “platforms.”
Platform… as in singular.
Microsoft is looking to completely unify its portable (meaning tablet), mobile (meaning phone) and desktop experiences into a single OS that will only install and run the bits that are appropriate for the hardware its running on. This convergence is a complete departure from over 30 years of business practice; and as such, they’re having the problems that most everyone is seeing in the (tech) news.
In fact, Larry Seltzer has a huge article detailing some real Microsoft Update Missteps that is worth a read. Things are changing at Microsoft, and what’s going on with Windows 8.x and with some of the official and leaked builds of Windows 10 speaks to the many development related paradigm shifts going on over at Microsoft.
At least they’re trying to change.
However, with everything that’s happening – the Windows 8.x Update missteps, the buggy internal and external Windows 10 builds, the Surface Pro 3 Wi-Fi issues, many – me included – are wondering who is steering the Microsoft Release Management Ship. At the very least, I think most are chalking this up to a change of CEO, but honestly, by this time, most of those hurdles should be cleared.
So, what does Microsoft need to Windows 10 to be..?
They need it to be a success. Windows 10 needs to be a unifying platform that doesn’t require all of the “legacy related, DOS-world” tweaking. It needs to just work out of the box, regardless of platform – tablet, phone or desktop.
Windows 10, more I think than Windows 7 did, needs to be sexy. It needs to lure users back to a user experience that provides a known, familiar feel, while providing a unified, POPULATED ecosystem where users can buy not only applications, but media content – audio, video and apps – without being totally disjointed. It needs a developer community that embraces it, with support from Microsoft as well as hardware vendors, alike.
Windows 10 needs to run Office 2010 and later – including Office 365 – without any burps or issues, as not everyone wants to upgrade or wants to buy a subscription to the productivity platform.
More than anything… Windows 10 needs to be dirt cheap. On the consumer side, that means free… as in zero dollars and zero cents. On the enterprise side, Microsoft needs to figure out how to sell OS licensing that makes sense for IT departments who don’t jump on the newest version OS because they don’t want new, untested bits to tank their company’s productivity and profits.
Microsoft needs to look at service and support on both the consumer and enterprise side of the equation, and they need to figure out a better life cycle that ends support and moves people to the most current bits in a manner that doesn’t cause a massive revolt. The OS needs to be solid, stable, and near bug free for those folks so they move without worry, and with confidence that, again – everything just works.
THAT kids… That’s a big order to fill.
However, I really think that if Microsoft doesn’t do it, and do it quickly, decisively and without any of the current drama, at least at some point, they’re going to force users into looking into alternatives. That means, alternative platforms, alternative productivity tools, and internal servers, middleware and other enterprise related software.
Microsoft is sitting on the edge of a very sharp knife named, “Change.” If they don’t embrace it and do its bidding, I think they’re really risking a LOT.
What do you think? Have you used Windows 10? Are you a Windows 8.x user experiencing update confusion and issues? Are you considering a move to Windows 10? Will you stay on Windows 7 until they pry it out of your cold, dead fingers (or until you buy a new PC and HAVE to take it)? Or, will you simply move to another computing platform like Linux or Mac?
Why don’t you meet me in the Discussion area, below and give me your thoughts on the whole thing. I’d love to hear what you have to say, and to see if I’m on target, or all wet…